Which one is true?
1. There is a God.
2. God has revealed himself, biblically.
3. We have freewill to believe or reject Gods revelation.
1. There is no God.
2. There is no reason for our existence.
3. There is no absolute truth.
Only Bible Atheism
Noahs Flood Kinds debunk evolution and old earth without confronting. Just give best evidence for Noahs flood, and
Multiple Topic Page
Noah's Ark Chinese Language, Worldwide flood legends
Bible Predicts Future Tech
Traced back language names
More Prophecies I could add
The prophecy concerning the statue that represented the coming great kingdoms of the world. Think feet of iron and clay ect..
The prophecy concerning that island of tyre? That would be destroyed, two different occasions.
Jesus prophesying that the temple would be destroyed which was fulfilled roughly 80 years latter.
The prophecies of many false teachers would come.
The prophecies of the spiritual wickedness in the last days, also seven churches.
Typologies Ruckmans Bible Bulliten January 2011 last v
Greatest Debates page probably better to just have youtube playlist
Question to ask atheist ect.... muslim
Each topic has a main page, for example click or double tap Science In The Bible box for that topics best evidence
Trusting the text article, could be used for reliability of the bible page
Welcome to Y The Bible website. There is an immense amount of evidence for the Bible. Yet most people even most Christians are unaware. The purpose of this site is to share the best evidence and resources.
Leviticus 17:11 "For the life of the flesh is in the blood."
The Scriptures declare that blood is the source of life. Up until two hundred years ago, sick people were “bled,” and many died because of the practice. We now know that blood is the source of life. It carries water and nourishment to every cell, removes the waste material from cells, and maintains the body’s temperature. This vital element also carries oxygen from the lungs throughout the body. If you lose your blood, you will lose your life.
Strong evidence for a Designer comes from the fine-tuning of the universal constants and the solar system, e.g.
The electromagnetic coupling constant binds electrons to protons in atoms. If it was smaller, fewer electrons could be held. If it was larger, electrons would be held too tightly to bond with other atoms.
Ratio of electron to proton mass (1:1836). Again, if this was larger or smaller, molecules could not form.
Carbon and oxygen nuclei have finely tuned energy levels.
Electromagnetic and gravitational forces are finely tuned, so the right kind of star can be stable.
Our sun is the right colour. If it was redder or bluer, photosynthetic response would be weaker.
Our sun is also the right mass. If it was larger, its brightness would change too quickly and there would be too much high energy radiation. If it was smaller, the range of planetary distances able to support life would be too narrow; the right distance would be so close to the star that tidal forces would disrupt the planet’s rotational period. UV radiation would also be inadequate for photosynthesis.
The earth’s distance from the sun is crucial for a stable water cycle. Too far away, and most water would freeze; too close and most water would boil.
The earth’s gravity, axial tilt, rotation period, magnetic field, crust thickness, oxygen/nitrogen ratio, carbon dioxide, water vapour and ozone levels are just right.
Former atheist Sir Fred Hoyle states, ‘commonsense interpretation of the facts is that a super-intelligence has monkeyed with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces in nature.’
By cameeron bertuzzi
(1) The existence of a life-permitting universe is improbable on Naturalism. (2) The existence of a life-permitting universe is not improbable on Theism. (3) The existence of a life-permitting universe is evidence for Theism over Naturalism.